The United States have put terrorists and thugs in power in Iraq(Dawa and SCIRI)?

Because they can't see past the tip of their nose. The States has a history of arming folks that they later fight... it's all in what the vested interest happens to be at the time. In many cases as long as the oil flows, the US government is happy. It's easy to ignore human rights violations as long as the power is getting what it wants. But as soon as the want is threatened, the tune that everyone is dancing to changes. Okay... I know I've gone a bit afield of the question... but really that's it. Can't see past the end of their noses... might makes right...

it would help them by skill of permitting them to legislate greater ability and herald a Socialist nanny state under the pretense of "conserving united statesa." and people who're adversarial to this new unconstitutional law would be seen "unamerican", or "unpatriotic" .... this got here approximately under Bush and subsequently the Patriot Act grew to become into handed. Terror assaults continually benefit the administration. Why else do you think of the CIA and different rogue aspects degree fake Flag assaults? i.e. Operation Northwoods. this is all approximately Diocletian's problem=reaction=answer. government's create a difficulty, assume a reaction, then "furnish" a answer. would we ever have long gone into Iraq w/o 9/11? upload: (addressing further information): Ahhhhh, nooow you're directly to something. those strikes of starting to be a disaster as an highway to furnish a 'answer' (aka sell an unpopular time table) have worked so nicely in the previous that the likes of Nero, Hitler, Napoleon and a great form of others have used it. Nero burned the city of Rome and blamed it on the Christians; this got here because of the fact of his hatred for the Christians and how they have been undermining his tyrannical reign. Hitler did it with the Reichstag and blamed the arson on a mentally retarded guy or woman. He then used this to launch his propaganda campaign of ways the mentally unwell have been a threat to society and can be eradicated.

Iran want to create its own oil market, based in Euro. Problem started in Iraq for the exact same reason and conflicts with Venezuela too. War with Iraq started when Saddam was planing the very sane thing. Without the oil being priced in US$, Us currency is worth next to nothing. If Usa was a business, presenting the financial sheet would have resulted in a bankrupt years ago.

All other answers from your government are fascist propaganda. This propaganda goes on FOX, CNN and much more.

You find this surprising? Why do you think we (the US) were so sure Saddam had chemical weapons? We gave them to him. We armed his regime while he was fighting Iran.

Throughout history the US government has armed those who are the least offensive to us at that particular moment in time. We usually go back in and have to fight against them (and against our own weapons) at a later date because their politics no longer fit with what we want.

When Muslim freedom fighters (Mujahideen) were fighting communist Russia occupation, who do you think was giving them stinger missles? Who was funneling money through Saudia Araba to none other than Osama Bin Laden and his group of Islamist fighters? When the Soviet Union withdrew in 1989 we let the various Mujahideen groups battle it out and even funded a splinter group known as "the students" or Taliban through money funneled through Pakistan's government. We liked them at that time because they were more "anti-communist" than any of the other groups.

So if you think US putting terrorists and thugs into power in Iraq is anything new, you need to go back and review history. I have only touched on the more recent examples of the United States intervention in Middle East politics. Start looking back around 1918 when we really got serious about asserting our policies in this area.

It's not the first time that the US has empowered ruthless people and terrorist. They have also done this in numerous countries in the middle east and Africa to ensure that the pillaging and usurpation of Africa's resources will continue at the expense of human life. The USA has a history of employing tactics such as this while standing aside with hypocrisy as people die and other atrocities occur, the government will claim no responsibility and allow it to happen until what they began reaches a climatic, satisfactory conclusion that is conducive for the US to step in and employ what essentially amounts to colonial empowerment.

they also provided bin laden with weapons and aided sadam once it has always been do as i say not as i do, if your with the us your a freedom fighter if your anyone else your a terrorist. unfortunetly the us has the weapons to do what they want without much worry anyone being able to fight back affectivly, look at the japan nuclear bombs they only used two to prove they had more than one but they only had one more

Actually, if you do your research, Bill Clinton was responsible for quite a bit of this.

You're expecting consistency from the Bush administration?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Silly child! Where have YOU been?

Sounds like they are trying to make it Home from Home

When you have 150 000 troops bogged down in the desert with no way out, you will sup with the devil if it helps a bit