Le 4 mai 2021, la plateforme Yahoo Questions/Réponses fermera. Elle est désormais accessible en mode lecture seule. Aucune modification ne sera apportée aux autres sites ou services Yahoo, ni à votre compte Yahoo. Vous trouverez plus d’informations sur l'arrêt de Yahoo Questions/Réponses et sur le téléchargement de vos données sur cette page d'aide.

LG
Lv 7
LG a posé la question dans Arts & HumanitiesVisual ArtsPhotography · il y a 9 ans

Is there any issues with stitching four photos together as opposed to taking one shot with a better camera?

I have a 11MP Cannon 1Ds and am considering taking a scenic shot that I'm going to blow up to 40x60 and want it to be well detailed. One option is to take 4 shots with a 1Ds and an 135mm f2.0l and stitch them together with photoshop(locking the exposure of course). The other option is to rent a Hasselblad 40MP setup(I'm assuming it's a 645 format) to the tune of $250. I know the former option is more work but I want to save the $ if I can. But I'm wondering if the Hasselblad setup would offer any advantages.

Mise à jour:

And then I guess how much work is it to stitch them together. If I have to spend 40 hours with photoshop to get it to come out right I might go with the Hasselblad option.

And then I suppose there's the scanning a large format negaitve option. But then I have to deal with expensive processing and such.

4 réponses

Pertinence
  • il y a 9 ans
    Réponse favorite

    Forget the hassy, its not needed. Here is how I would handle it.

    Grab a 50mm and a tripod, mount the camera vertically and look through the viewfinder and on the left edge of the your subject, come about half way more left and take your shot. Then turn your camera to the right until your about 3/4 of the way into the next view, but leave some of the previous view in play. Take another shot. do this a few times until you have the entire seen covered, but no more than say 5 shots total.

    Open bridge and select all the images in the proper order and click on tools>photoshop>merge. Follow the prompts and I usually use auto but you can mess with the other options.

    let Photoshop cook for a while and it will pop out a Pano. Crop it to your specs and that's basically it.

    Source(s) : Pro
  • Anonyme
    il y a 5 ans

    What don't you like about the pictures? -Is it the content (i.e. do you want your subject to be more close-up, more in focus, etc.). Close-ups typically work best for people. Play around with the angle you're snapping the camera from. Put your subject near one of the corners; it shouldn't be in the center. Typically the most balanced images follow the 1/3 rule where your main focus is 1/3 away from either the top or bottom and 1/3 away from either side. -If it's the technical aspects (lighting, color, etc) it may be helpful to take a class to show you how and when to use flash, what speed you should use for what you're trying to obtain, etc. Of course you could always use Photoshop to adjust some of these as well. It may help to slow down a bit. Take less pictures, but strive to make the ones you do take good. It'll force you to focus on what you're trying to obtain and hopefully with time, you'll improve. Definatly don't try to interfere or pose the image too much. A lot comes down to knowing when exactly to push the shutter.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    il y a 9 ans

    With a tripod, you don't even have to use photoshop although it or similar program or online service might blend the pixels at the over lap better. First answer looks good

  • il y a 9 ans

    You will spend about twenty minutes stitching four photos together. I'd definitely do this.

    http://www.digital-photography-school.com/creating...

Vous avez d’autres questions ? Pour obtenir des réponses, posez vos questions dès maintenant.