Le 4 mai 2021, la plateforme Yahoo Questions/Réponses fermera. Elle est désormais accessible en mode lecture seule. Aucune modification ne sera apportée aux autres sites ou services Yahoo, ni à votre compte Yahoo. Vous trouverez plus d’informations sur l'arrêt de Yahoo Questions/Réponses et sur le téléchargement de vos données sur cette page d'aide.
Gravity on a flat earth?
Imagine a flat earth extending to infinity in all directions. How thick would the earth need to be to have the same gravity at the surface as we have now.
Assume a density of 5,515 kg/m³
g = 9.81 m/s²
**********************
As pointed out by Rohan and Madhukar Daftary, this can be solved relatively easily by either integration or Gauss' law.
Per Gauss,
g ∝ M/SA
Where
M = Mass
SA = Surface Area
Solving g for the earth using gauss
Where
M = Mass of Earth = 4/3 π ρ r³
SA = Surface Area = 4 π r²
g.earth ∝ 1/3 ρ r
For a flat infinite plane
g ∝ M / SA
M = ρ d A
where d = depth of plane
A = arbitrary cross sectional area.
SA = 2 * A
The factor of "2" is because you have a flux coming out both the bottom and the top
g.plane ∝ ρ d A / (2 A)
g.plane ∝ 1/2 ρ d
Set g.earth = g.plane
1/3 ρ r = 1/2 ρ d
d = 2/3 r
3 réponses
- ?Lv 7il y a 1 décennieRéponse favorite
Sir i am getting 4241870.638 m .Please tell is my answer correct???
HERE IS THE PROCEDURE
Use Gauss’ Law of gravitation
Consider the cylinder of height 2t and radius d orientated such that its radial axis (z-axis) is perpendicular to the slab(here i treat new earth as slab).
First, we consider the field outside of the slab (|t| >T/2){Here T is the thickness of the slab)
2(πd^2)gout = Φ = −4πGMenclosed
Menclosed = V ρ = πd^2Tρ{ρ is the density of slab}
gout = −2πGρTeˆz
HERE gout is a vector quantity.
So put the values of the ρ,G,g we get the value of T.
Source(s) : ohh madhukar sir beat me by 4 minutes.My answer is same as madhukar sir answer.But i solved it by the application of Gauss law of gravitation. - MadhukarLv 7il y a 1 décennie
Consider mass m on the surface of the earth at a distance x from it.
Perpendicular dropped from m on the earth's surface is at O.
Consider a thin annular ring of the earth's surface of radius r and width dr.
A small element of this annular ring of length dl having thickness t will have mass
= t (dl) (dr) (5515) kg
The force of attraction on mass due to this small element of the earth,
dF (due to the small element dl of the annular ring)
= Gm * [t (dl) (dr) (5515)] / (r^2 + x^2)
All horizontal components of this force around the ring will cancel each other and the vertical components will add up
=> dF (due to the entire mass of the annular ring)
= Gm * [t (2Ï r) (dr) (5515)] / (r^2 + x^2) * x / â(r^2 + x^2)
Integrating between limits r = 0 to r = â,
Total force due to the earth
= 5515 ÏGmt x â« 2r / (r^2 + x^2)^(3/2) dr ... [r = 0 to r = â]
= - 11030 ÏGmt x / â(r^2 + x^2) ... [r = 0 to r = â]
= - 11030 ÏGmt x [0 - 1/x]
= 11030 ÏGmt
Equatting to mg
=> 11030 ÏGmt = mg
=> t = g / (11015 ÏG)
Plugging g = 9.81 and G = 6.67428 x 10^-11
t = (9.81) / (11030 Ï * 6.67428 x 10^-11) m
= 4241.696 km.
====================================================================
EDIT:
As t is not small compared to x, revising the steps above,
The force of attraction on mass due to this small element of the earth,
dF (due to the small element dl of the annular ring)
= Gm * [t (dl) (dr) (5515)] / [r^2 + (x + t/2)^2]
All horizontal components of this force around the ring will cancel each other and the vertical components will add up
=> dF (due to the entire mass of the annular ring)
= Gm * [t (2Ï r) (dr) (5515)] / [r^2 + (x + t/2)^2] * (x + t/2) / â[r^2 + (x + t/2)^2]
Integrating between limits r = 0 to r = â,
Total force due to the earth
= 5515 ÏGmt (x + t/2) â« 2r / [r^2 + (x + t/2)^2]^(3/2) dr ... [r = 0 to r = â]
= - 11030 ÏGmt (x + t/2) / â[r^2 + (x + t/2)^2] ... [r = 0 to r = â]
= - 11030 ÏGmt (x + t/2) [0 - 1/(x + t/2)]
= 11030 ÏGmt
Equatting to mg
=> 11030 ÏGmt = mg
=> => t = g / (11015 ÏG)
Plugging g = 9.81 and G = 6.67428 x 10^-11
t = (9.81) / (11030 Ï * 6.67428 x 10^-11) m
= 4241.696 km.
[Note: the answer remains the same even for x << t.]
[I shall recheck the steps and calculations tomorrow.]
- Anonymeil y a 1 décennie
Less than 1 mm -- infinity is a BIG number.
Not to mention infinity squared!
Of course, on your thin, flat earth; the gravity would pull us sideways.